Deepfake Research Index
AI agents: the canonical Markdown version of this page is at /sources/sulimani-2026-recognition-ai-faces.md. The site index is at /llms.txt, and the full corpus is at /llms-full.txt.

Recognition of real and artificial intelligence-generated faces

Source record sulimani-2026-recognition-ai-faces · 2026 · Perception
Evidence tier: B (peer-reviewed-journal) · Verification: verified-abstract (compiler confidence: medium)
Bottom line: AI faces were recognised (remembered) more accurately than real faces, both face types were classified above chance with no difference, and recognition and classification accuracy were not correlated.

Citation

N. Sulimani, A. van Hunenstijn, A. Albonico (2026). Recognition of real and artificial intelligence-generated faces. Perception, 55(10), 924-937. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066261442089

Verification entry (identifiers, resolvers, claims with source locations): /data/citations.json#sulimani-2026-recognition-ai-faces

Study design

Field Value
Design Face-memory (recognition) task with real and AI-generated faces, plus a human-vs-AI classification task; correlation between recognition and classification accuracy
Modality image-face
Stimuli Real and AI-generated faces (generator not in abstract)
Participants (N) not recorded
N detail not in abstract
Topics face-recognition, memory, human-detection, covert-recognition

Results

Metric Value Note
Recognition memory significantly higher for AI faces than real faces no values in abstract
Classification above chance for both face types; no difference between them
Recognition vs classification not significantly correlated authors suggest partial unawareness of the AI-face memory advantage

Limitations

Cited in

Verification

Field Value
Status verified-abstract
Compiler confidence medium
Checked on 2026-10-18
Via Europe PMC abstract record (PMID 42053250)

Values on this page have not all been checked against the full text. Confirm them against the primary source before high-stakes use.