Deepfake Research Index
AI agents: the canonical Markdown version of this page is at /sources/chen-2026-humans-ai-deepfake-teaming.md. The site index is at /llms.txt, and the full corpus is at /llms-full.txt.

How Humans and AI Detect Deepfakes Differently: Complementary Strategies for Human-AI Teaming

Source record chen-2026-humans-ai-deepfake-teaming · 2026 · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Evidence tier: B (peer-reviewed-conference) · Verification: verified-abstract (compiler confidence: medium)
Bottom line: Humans and AI detectors relied on different cues; eye-tracking and EEG suggested holistic, flexible human viewing that catches some inconsistencies AI misses, and people with more AI exposure matched or exceeded AI detectors in some contexts (abstract; no numbers reported).

Citation

Xinyi Chen, et al. (2026). How Humans and AI Detect Deepfakes Differently: Complementary Strategies for Human-AI Teaming. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261487968

Verification entry (identifiers, resolvers, claims with source locations): /data/citations.json#chen-2026-humans-ai-deepfake-teaming

Study design

Field Value
Design Eye-tracking and EEG comparison of human and AI attention allocation in deepfake detection, across levels of AI literacy
Modality video
Stimuli Deepfake media manipulating lip movements, facial expressions and voices (details not in abstract)
Participants (N) not recorded
N detail N not reported in the abstract; OpenAlex lists Jing Yang (University at Buffalo) as last author; full author list not confirmed
Topics human-detection, human-ai-teaming, neural

Results

Metric Value Note
Cue use humans and AI rely on different cues and reasoning strategies qualitative
Human vs AI detector people with more AI exposure may match or exceed AI detectors in some contexts no figures in abstract
Processing style holistic, flexible visual processing eye-tracking and EEG evidence

Moderators

Limitations

Cited in

Verification

Field Value
Status verified-abstract
Compiler confidence medium
Checked on 2026-10-19
Via OpenAlex abstract record W7221715535 for doi:10.1177/10711813261487968

Values on this page have not all been checked against the full text. Confirm them against the primary source before high-stakes use.